Another day, another H1N1 debate.
Thursday, November 5th, 2009And another one being requested by Michael Ignatieff’s liberal party. Why? It might just be they really think the government isn’t doing what it’s supposed to be doing–is somehow, possibly, holding things back and preventing Canadians from being vaccinated against it sooner. Of course, it’s every bit as likely it could also be that they genuinely believe every word of the email that was rather accidentally on purpose spread around by liberal upper management, starting with their president, Alfred Apps.
The slightly less talked about possibility? They’re targetting the misery vote. Which, as the National Post is quick to point out, doesn’t carry a whole lot of benefit. Well, beyond the fact the liberal party gets to beat this issue to death while all the while tooting their own horn about their better than now preparedness during the SARS outbreak of 2003.
Naw, that can’t be it either. I mean, they aren’t saying their plans would be a whole lot better than the currently in place plans, are they? Surely not. That would be like casting doubt on themselves. Considering most if not all the current plans in place are leftovers from days of old, when crises like that would have been a liberal problem to deal with. Including the single-source contract with GSK to produce the H1N1 vaccine, that was entered into under Jean Chretien and which isn’t up until 2011. The liberals aren’t now taking aim at a uselessly bad contract into which they entered, are they? I didn’t think so.